PDA

View Full Version : Subconscious motivation and conscious want



jodi henley
February 20th, 2011, 05:12 PM
In one of your blog posts you said something about making the character's external goal a symbol of their inner motivation (inner need) In the example you posted, you had a boy fighting for a cat (his external goal) because to him this cat represented the feeling of self-worth he got from his grandmother (who had a cat.)

…and I love this post. One of my favorites.

I love the idea of linking the characters external goal and inner need, and using that need to drive not just the external goal, but all the character's decisions actions. But in some romance novels the character's external goal seems to take them right away from fulfilling their inner need eg the hero's unconscious inner need is for a close loving family, but his external goal is to take a job travelling from place to place and avoiding all emotional entanglements.
I can't work out what is driving the character in a case like this. (apart from fear ) The character's core need is a loving family . (He won't admit it and doesn't even realise it, but this is the only thing that will make him truly happy) but he's acting as if his need is escape.

This is actually two questions, one that deals with layering the transformational arc and another that deals with core events.

What do we know about this guy? (let's call him John)

*John needs a loving family to make him happy.
*But what John really wants and is actively pursuing is a wandering-man kind of job where he can keep all his emotional entanglements shallow.

Lots of people know what’ll make them happy so why does John have this disconnect?

Depending on the sub-genre, and the kind of person John is, it can be all kinds of things so...let’s say this is a straight-up contemporary and give him some background. John grew up with a loving, wonderful family. His mom and dad finally took off last year RVing around the country. He has a brother named Cal, a great sister-in-law and a niece who just turned eight. He's well adjusted, stable and ten years into a job at the hospital where he’s an anesthesiologist--rock-solid, right up until the day he decides to go winter camping with his brother and sister-in-law.

Because of a faulty GPS they end up in a ditch. Cal and his wife die in screaming agony while their little girl and John are trapped—unable to do anything but watch. By the time they’re found, the kid is all but catatonic. John’s parents can’t cope with Cal’s death, and there’s this girl—once the apple of their eye—who just sits there.

John is carrying huge survivor’s guilt—not helped by the fact his mom blames him for Cal’s death. If you’d been the one driving, if you’d pointed out the road, if you’d been able to tear free and get everyone out of the car…Never mind he was trapped in the wreckage.

Flash forward eight months. His mom and dad put the kid in a nursing home, leave for Arizona, and John has issues. His parents can’t stand the sight of him, he’s in serious emotional pain and he’s got crippling guilt. If there’s one thing he knows, it’s that he should have died instead of Cal.

…in some romance novels the character's external goal seems to take them right away from fulfilling their inner need eg the hero's unconscious inner need is for a close loving family, but his external goal is to take a job travelling from place to place and avoiding all emotional entanglements.

John “wants” to run, can you doubt it? His parents hate him, his niece is a visible reminder of his failure, his beloved brother is gone—and it’s all his fault. He’s in pain. And when people are hurting, they try to avoid the source of that pain—which in John’s case is his family.

I can't work out what is driving the character in a case like this. (apart from fear ) The character's core need is a loving family . (He won't admit it and doesn't even realise it, but this is the only thing that will make him truly happy) but he's acting as if his need is escape.

He’s afraid to love, because love got him into this mess. No one can hurt you like a loved one. John loved his brother, but Cal died, he loved his mom and she rejected him. His niece is catatonic and with every passing day, John slips deeper into a downward spiral.

He doesn’t “want” a family, what he really wants is to get the hell out of Dodge.

People are enormously complex and have lots of motivations, many of which go back to a trigger or core event. If Cal hadn’t died, there would be no story—if John’s mom hadn’t done an Ordinary People on him, John wouldn’t be so messed up.

Deep down, John needs someone—a family or just the heroine—to accept him and give him the space to heal. It wasn’t his fault, but when the people who say they love you turn their backs on you, you don’t think logically. Right now John equates love with betrayal. He’s afraid of opening himself up to love because he’s in pain, angry at being betrayed by his parents, angry at himself for not being able to help his brother. Angry because he knows there was nothing he could do and guilty because deep down he knows he should have been able to do something. He’s not just running from the situation, he’s running from himself.

By the end of the story he'll realise what he needs to make him happy, but in planning my story do I make him motivated by escape -- or by family (his true need) ? Or maybe I should have him driven by escape until the midpoint, but then he begins to veer towards his true need (a loving family. )

It’s not that easy, and that’s the trouble with character-driven stories. They’re hard to plot because motivation isn’t always linear. John has issues only he can take care of. So it’s probably better to say his motivations are in a process of push and pull.

Internal conflict.

Although the trouble with internal conflict is that it’s often subconscious. The John Cal's death has turned him into versus the John who can accept love and become the person he was meant to be.

Which means this…

…the idea of linking the characters external goal and inner need, and using that need to drive not just the external goal, but all the character's decisions actions.

...needs to be more complex.

The kid and his cat are a fairly simple way to link external goal and inner needs, because the kid has a single motivation and there are only two layers. The kid’s external goal—getting a cat, and his inner need—the self-worth represented by the cat.

Just like the kid, John’s external goal and inner need are in sync. He wants to get away because he wants to stop the pain. Everything he does flows out of that. But he also has stuff going on that he doesn’t know about—a subconscious need for love and family complicated by the fallout of his issues, which is cool because you want your people to be multi-dimensional but the trouble is—how to show it?

By giving him a goal that represents his subconscious need.

Think one layer down. Not something that represents his inner need—which is to stop the pain, but his subconscious need, which is for love and family.

In short, he needs his niece to get better.

Remember her? In a coma, totally unresponsive—locked away by the people who should have loved her? John loves her too, and visits every week. He can’t do anything for her—but he desperately “wants” her to get better.

She’s the symbol of everything he lost and everything he can gain. Her recovery is a visible manifestation of his transformational arc. And that’s what this question was all about—how to show John’s arc.

John was never motivated to actively seek a loving family, because through the entire book his motivation was always to get away. It’s through the process of coming to know and care for that family (or heroine) that he changes enough to start the healing process, accept and return love--and at that point, the end of the book, his motivation finally changes to actively pursuing his subconscious need because it's no longer subconscious.

Janet Chamberlain
February 20th, 2011, 06:39 PM
This looks familiar :)

I've been thinking a lot about these 2 opposing needs. I love your solution to the problem but maybe there's a second approach that will work too (?)

The problem:
"...the hero's unconscious inner need is for a close loving family, but his external goal is to take a job travelling from place to place and avoiding all emotional entanglements."

We start with this hero who will only be truly happy when he has a loving family. But the need driving him seems to be: to avoid all emotional entanglements. which gives us two needs in oppostion and an external goal that's in opposition to his deep need (instead of coming out of it) ie that travelling job

Which makes planning the story a little difficult as it's always easier when the external goal represents the deep inner need.

What if instead of letting him have two opposing needs, we find a single need that both these needs feed into? (And at the same time make it a need that will be the motivation behind his external goal.)

What if instead of changing his external goal we have both these needs feed into one single need--one that represents the external goal.

What if his need for family comes out of a deep need for emotional security. Then his need to avoid emotional entanglements will be his misguided attempt to gain emotional security. Now his external goal does come out of his need (beacuse the travelling job is the first step towards emotional security. )

He subconsciously believes that If he travels, he won't be in any one place long enough to form close friendships and this will make sure he avoids emotional entanglements (He's been hurt and is determined not to risk getting hurt again. He believes that avoiding situations that lead to close relationships will bring him emotional security.)

Eventually he'll realise that the emotional security he craves will come not from avoiding relationships (and taking a job that prevents forming long-term friendships) but from having a family. He needed emotional security but was misguided about the way to get it. He was acting out of fear instead of risking a new relationship


So for a problem like the above we can either change the character's external goal, as you have --or find one single need that the two seemingly opposing ones will feed into.

As long as the external goal comes out of the inner need we should have no problem planning the character arc?

Janet

Margaret Fieland
February 20th, 2011, 10:05 PM
Ladies, thanks for the interesting take on this .. I've learned a lot from reading your two points of view ..

jodi henley
February 20th, 2011, 10:24 PM
This looks familiar :)


Janet


LOL!!!!!! Hi Janet!

well duh it looks familiar since I wrote it for you.

I'm glad you've had time to think about it.

...true. You can use one or two goals. I just like intricate angsty heroes with very oblique motivations, but yes--that's a good way to plan out the arc. :)

Glad you made it over! I hope everything is working out for you.

:) Jodi

Janet Chamberlain
February 21st, 2011, 10:50 AM
Hi Jodi,

I'm glad you've had time to think about it.
Your advice helped me so much. I was worried I was overthinking things, but things are so much clearer now -- I'm so pleased I kept going over this until I understood it better.
I can see that before I was even thinking about layering the transformational arc. Your answer was a terrific help. I've been stuck at the planning stage for months, but I feel as though I can get past that now.

Is your story consultancy service just for full completed stories, or do you also offer help at the planning/outlining stage?

jodi henley
February 21st, 2011, 02:00 PM
Hi Jodi,

I'm glad you've had time to think about it.
Your advice helped me so much. I was worried I was overthinking things, but things are so much clearer now -- I'm so pleased I kept going over this until I understood it better.
I can see that before I was even thinking about layering the transformational arc. Your answer was a terrific help. I've been stuck at the planning stage for months, but I feel as though I can get past that now.

Cool!!! That's the best part about these workshops (and my blog too, although in a lesser way), helping people to find their own way. :)


Is your story consultancy service just for full completed stories, or do you also offer help at the planning/outlining stage?

I do two kinds of consulting. One is called a story arc and character analysis for complete stories. I specialize in intricate character-driven thrillers and epic fantasy. I'm also becoming known for hard-to-peg things where you "know" something is off but can't figure out what it is and how to fix it. For some reason, a lot of WW2 romances have that issue. But I can do anything short of experimental literary fiction and chick-lit.

for something like that you need to email me jodihenley@gmail.com

and I'll send you to my office person. I'm affiliated with an agency as an independent contractor. Since it's a major undertaking it pulls down some cash, and it helps to keep the money and the creative sides separate.

for everything else, planning, outlining, fixing multi-book arcs (I'm doing that today), troubleshooting characters, you name it and it doesn't involve reading 200k stories? (partials and stuff are included in this group, too) then it's fifty dollars an hour and you buy me a sandwich if we meet in person and you want to talk. :) Just joking--okay, nah. Not really, the last couple of people bought me a sandwich, so I think it's become part of the deal.

But I work fast and clean, and if I have to stop to ask questions, the clock stops there. And starts again once I'm back in the groove, so there's no padding. I consider it a decent value. I'd consider a partial with synopsis probably an hour, maybe a little more, worth of work and trouble-shooting a plan a little less. Depends on what you have. I'll ball-park quote up front once I see the material.

Stuff like that I can work in between the big gigs so it's just a matter of letting me know what you need and me checking my schedule. I have major consultings booked through the end of April. And that's probably a little more than you wanted to know, lol.:o

I'm glad the workshop worked for you, Janet. I was kind of worried about the people from RD. :)